Skip to content

Lewyn Addresses America

A little politics, a little urbanism- I also blog 100 percent on urbanism at and

From most recent to first (mostly)

1.  Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago, Klinenberg

2. Boardwalk of Dreams: Atlantic City and the Fate of Urban America, Simon

3. Hanukkah in America: A History, Ashton

4. Chester Alan Arthur, Karabell

5. The Unexpected President: The Life and Times of Chester A. Arthur, Greenberg

6.  Detroit Hustle: A Memoir of Love, Life and Home, Haimerl

7.  On Division, Goldbloom

8.  The Oppermanns, Feucthwanger

9. Seventh Heaven: Travels Through Jewish Latin America, Stavans

10. Dissident Rabbi: The Life of Jacob Sasportas, Dweck (really liked this)

11. The Vienna Model 2, Forster

12. Buffalo at the Crossroads: The Past, Present and Future of American Urbanism, Christensen

13. Fear City: New York’s Fiscal Crisis and the Rise of Austerity Politics, Phillips-Fein

14. A Rich Brew: How Cafes Created Modern Jewish Culture, Pinsker

15. Between Heimat and Hatred: Jews and the Right in Germany, 1871-1935, Nielsen

16. No Place to Go: Answering the Call of Nature in the Urban Jungle, Lowe

17. Babylonian Life and History, Budge

18. The Scholems: A Story of the German Jewish Bourgeousie from Emancipation to Destruction, Geller

19. Manasseh ben Israel: Rabbi of Amsterdam, Nadler

20-22. Derashot Ledorot, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy, Lamm

23.  Right of Way: Race, Class and the Silent Epidemic of Pedestrian Deaths in America, Schmitt (really liked)

24. Worship of the Heart: Essays on Jewish Prayer, Soloveitchik

25. High Point: The Inside Story of Seattle’s First Green Mixed-Income Neighborhood, Phillips

26. Salty Coffee: Untold Stories By Jewish Women, Pesci

27-29. The Commentators’ Bible: The Rubin JPS Miqraot Gedolot, Carasik (Genesis, Numbers and Deuteronomy volumes- read parts of the other two)

30.  From Mobility to Accessibility: Transforming Urban Transportation and Land Use Planning, Levine

31.  How Paris Became Paris: The Invention of the Modern City, Dejean (really liked this)

32. Disability Law for Property, Land Use and Zoning Lawyers, Malloy

33.  Bubble In the Sun: The Florida Land Boom of the 1920s and How It Brought On the Great Depression, Knowlton

34.Rebuilding Jewish Life in Germany, Geller

35. “Rescue the Surviving Souls”: The Great Jewish Refugee Crisis of the 17th Century, Teller (really liked)

36. Pogrom:Kishinev and the Tilt of History, Zipperstein

37. The Address Book: What Street Addresses Reveal about Identity, Race, Wealth and Power, Mask

38. Five Days: The Fiery Reckoning of An American City, Moore

38. Abyss of Despair, Hanover

40. Our People: Discovering Lithuania’s Hidden Holocast, Vanagaite (really liked)

41.  Cities of Refuge: German Jews in London and New York, 1935-45, Bihler

42. What ifs of Jewish History: From Abraham to Zionism, Rosenfeld

43. A Place They Called Home: Reclaiming Citizenship. Stories of a New Jewish Return to Germany, Swarthout

44.  Jerusalem Unbound: Geography, History, and the Future of the Holy City, Dumper

45. The Urban Mystique: Notes on California, Los Angeles and Beyond, Stephens

46. Leading A Worthy Life: Finding Meaning in Modern Times, Kass

47. The Garments of Torah: Essays in Biblical Hermaneutics, Fishbane

48. Kiss the Hand You Cannot Bite: The Rise and Fall of the Ceaucescus, Behr

49.  Munich 1938: Appeasement and World War II, Faber

50.  Jerusalem: City of Longing, Goldhill

51. Five Rules for Tomorrow’s Cities: Design in an Age of Urban Migration, Demographic Change, and a Disappearing Middle Class, Condon (interesting)

52. East Central Europe Between the Two World Wars,Rothschild

53. Queens Noir, Knightly

54.  Kansas City Noir, Paul

55.  The Holocaust Averted: An Alternate History of American Jewry, 1938-67, Gurock

56.  Five Days In Philadelphia: The Amazing “”We Want Willkie!”” Convention of 1940 and How It Freed FDR to Save the Western World, Peters (very well done)

57.   Right Here, Right Now: The Buffalo Anthology, Biehl (the best of its type that I have read)

58. The St. Louis Anthology, Schuessler

59.  Germany On Their Minds: German Jewish Refugees in the United States and Their Relationships with Germany, 1938–1988, Schendlein

60. Cleveland Neighborhood Guidebook, Belt Publishing

61. The Chicago Neighborhood Guidebook, Bayne

62. Running the Books: The Adventures of an Accidental Prison Librarian, Steinberg

63. When they Come for Us, We’ll Be Gone: The Epic Struggle to Save Soviet Jewry, Beckerman

64. The Great Escape: Nine Jews who Fled Hitler and Changed the World, Marton

65. Maimonides’ Hidden Torah Commentary: Exodus 1-20

66. Budapest 1900: A Historical Portrait of a City And Its Culture, Lukacs

67. The Holocaust in Hungary: An Anthology of Jewish Response, Handler

68.  Under the Frog, Fischer

69. Neighborhood Defenders, Einstein et al. (another impressive book on zoning)

70. Crossing Lines: History of Jews and Gentiles in Three Communities, Goldstein

71. Red Star, Blue Star: The Lives and Times of Jewish Students in Communist Hungary, Handler

72. Fighting Back, Levin

73. Until the Dawn’s Light, Appelfeld

74. Greetings from Old Budapest, Kollin

75. Worship of the Heart: A Study of Maimonides’ Philosophy of Religion, Benor

76.  New York, Revesz

77. Memoirs of a Jewish Extremist: An American Story, Halevi

78. Alone Together, Cromley

79.  To Worship God Properly: Tensions Between Liturgical Custom and Halakhah in Judaism, Langer

80. Golden Gates: Fighting For Housing in America, Dougherty

81. A History of Street Networks: From Grids to Sprawl and Beyond, Aurbach

82. The Town Beyond the Wall, Wiesel

83. Jewish Liturgy: A Comprehensive History, Elbogen (often dull but encyclopedic)

84. Manhattan Moves Uptown: An Illustrated History, Underwood

85. Highrise: Idea and Reality, Janser

86. Tunneling to the Future: The Story of The Great Subway Expansion that Saved New York, Janser

87. In This Hour: Heschel’s Writings in Nazi Germany and London Exile

88. Bloomberg: A Billionaire’s Ambition, McNickle

89.  The Itinerary of Benjamin of Tudela: Travels in the Middle Ages

90.  The House That Hitler Built, Roberts

91. Young Lothar: An Underground Fugitive in Nazi Berlin

92. The Outside World, Mirvis

8 fiction

29 urban planning/studies/zoning

40 Judaism/Jewish history/Jewish studies

15 other non-fiction


NATIONAL POPULAR VOTE: Biden has a 7.2 pt lead according to Real Clear Politics (RCP) (more according to some more Dem-leaning poll aggregators).  Trump did about 1 pt better than the national polls in 2016, and I don’t see any reason to believe that this will be different.    So I am going to guess that Biden will win the national popular vote by around 6 – say 53-47 minus third party votes.  This means that the electoral map will look fairly similar to 2016 but that Biden might pick up the swing states he needs to win. Trump won half a dozen states by less than 2 pts (NC, Fla, Pa, Mi, Wi, Az) and Biden needs about half of them to win- fewer if he wins another state where he is polling decently.

NORTHEAST:  The only state that seems to at all be close is Pennsylvania; Biden seems to have a significant lead everywhere else, even in New Hampshire which was close in 2016.

So what happens in Pennsylvania?  The case for Biden: 1) the Democrats only lost by 1 pt or so in 2016, and so if you assume a 2 pt nationwide shift he wins; 2) he seems to be leading in most polls by 4 pts so if the polls are as off as in 2016 (2.6 pts) he still wins (but by only a point or so so that’s not exactly a comfortable margin); 3) polls are trying to weight for education to avoid underrepresenting the white working class, so they may be less inaccurate than in 2016.

On the other hand, 1) voter registration has been trending Republican for the past several years; 2) Biden leads by less than in Michigan and Wisconsin (the two other Rust Belt states that unexpectedly voted for Trump in ’16); 3) poll data so far doesn’t seem to reflect vote-by-mail totals. 

It looks like among mail voters, Democrats lead Republicans around 3-1 (66 percent D, 23 percent R, 10 percent independent, so overall about 71-73 percent Dem assuming a roughly equal number of people cross party lines and that Inds are slightly Dem).  But the polls I have seen divide voters into people who have already voted and those who have not voted yet, and some of them they show Rs getting 20 pct or less percent in the “already voted” category.  For example, this poll says Biden leads by 57 percent (78-21) among already-voted voers. Unless registered Republicans are deserting Trump in large numbers, that suggests polls are not picking up on a significant number of R mail voters.

On balance I am calling Pa for Biden but very, very reluctantly. If Biden was leading by less in the popular vote I’d probably say Trump carries it.

THE SOUTH:  Most of the South is pretty safe Republican, and Virginia is safe Democrat.  A few states are worth discussing:

North Carolina- polls show a close race.  Vote by mail totals show that Democrats lead Republicans in early voting but their edge is comparable to their overall voter registration lead.  Given that Repubs are more likely to vote on election day, this strikes me as some evidence that Trump will prevail.

On the other hand, every poll in RCP but Rasmussen (which tends to favor Rs) shows Biden with a slight lead. And every Senate poll shows the Democrat with a slight lead. Why does this matter? If there were a significant number of Trump voters lying to pollsters they would feel more comfortable admitting they were supporting the low-profile Republican Sen. Thom Tillis than they would be to admit they supported Trump. So Tillis’s failure to run ahead of Trump suggests people are telling the truth. (Does this argument reflect people simply refusing to respond to polls? No. But polls are often weighed by age, education etc to eliminate these biases). I am reluctantly calling NC for Biden but not with a lot of confidence.

Georgia- Another too close to call state.  Because polls are mixed and Ga. has voted Republican in the last several elections (even in 2018 with a terrible gubernatorial candidate), my instinct is that Trump carries it.  But if Biden does better than I expect Ga. will be one of the dominoes that are likely to fall.

Florida- Fla is so Republican that it threw out a Democratic Senator in 2018 (although not by a large margin). Also, the Rs ran a few pts ahead of polls that year. Given that fact, I think Fla is pretty likely to go for Trump.

Texas-  Texas has been a solidly Republican state for the last 20 years.  Also, the RCP poll average still favors Trump slightly.  So I think Trump holds it.  But if Biden wins by, say, 9 points instead of 7, Texas is another domino that could fall. I have to admit, huge voter turnout makes Texas a wild card though.

MIDWEST- Illinois is safe D, and Indiana, Missouri, ND, SD, Ks, Nebraska and Oklahoma are safe R.

Ohio- RCP average shows Ohio a tie.  Given its history of supporting Trump I think Trump probably wins- but as with Texas, if Biden does just a little better than I expect he can take it.

Michigan- Trump carried this state in 2016 but Biden seems to have a pretty consistent lead here.  (One recent poll, Trafalgar, shows Trump winning but that seems to be a pretty consistently pro-R poll- also, the poll says about a quarter of voters on each side are switching parties which seems highly unlikely, so I question its usefulness) I say Biden flips it.

Wisconsin- The polls pretty consistently show Biden leading in Wisconsin.  On the other hand, the polls were more wrong there in 2016 than anywhere else; Trump ran 7 pts ahead of the RCP poll average.  (Today’s RCP poll average shows about a 5 pt lead for Biden.)  But 2016 polls really didn’t weigh for education and thus underestimated white working class turnout.  It seems to me that this year’s polls are trying to avoid the same error.  So I reluctantly call Wisconsin for Biden.

Iowa- Trump won here by 9 pts in 2016. The state’s most reliable pollster (Des Moines Register) shows Trump with a 7 pt lead. Although some polls show a close race I still think Trump wins here.

Minnesota- This state was close in 2016 but the Dems carried it. Biden seems to have a pretty consistent lead here so I think Biden will win it unless the national race is closer than I expect.

THE WEST- Some states (Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Utah, Alaska) are safe R – others (Colorado, New Mexico, Washington, Oregon, California, Hawaii) are safe D.  The only states worth discussing are Arizona and Nevada.

Nevada- Biden has a small but steady lead here.  Also, Nevada is one of the few states where Dems did better than in the polls. SoI think Biden wins Nevada.

Arizona- Arizona went for Trump by a few pts last year, but today’s polls show it to be close and leaning slightly to Biden (RCP average Biden by 1),,

Voter registration data suggests early voters are fairly evenly divided between Dems and Reps- so that supports calling it for Trump (as does Trump’s 3.5 point lead in 2016).

But… 1) In Arizona the polls were very accurate in 2016 so there is no reason to believe polls are underestimating the Trump vote; 2) the Republicans lost a Senate race they were favored in in 2018 and seem about to lose another one this year, which suggests a trend towards Dems; 3) the Dems are leading in the Senate race there, which could just mean there’s lots of ticket splitting but might also mean some Democrats are willing to admit they are for Kelly (the Dem Senate candidate) but not for Biden; 4) there are 6 real tossup states (i.e. one candidate has a less than 3 pt lead) (NC, Fla, Ga, Tx, Ohio, Iowa and Az) and it is hard to believe Biden will not win one or two of them; 5) the polls favoring Trump (Rasmussen, Trafalgar, Susquehanna) are consistently Republican leaning polls.  So I am inclined to guess Biden wins Arizona.

If I am right, Biden wins 296-242.  But I am very skittish about both my Pa, NC and Az calls- I’d say I have about a 51 percent level of certainty about all 3.  (And also I am assuming that Republican courts don’t upend the results somehow).

By the way, we should have most of North Carolina and Arizona’s results Tuesday except for a few straggling absentee ballots; Pennsylvania will take much longer.  So I think if it is as close as I think it is this could take a while and there is lots of room for court fights etc. 

Right now it seems likely based on current polling that the Democrats will lose Alabama, and that (at a minimum) they pick up Colorado, Maine and Arizona.  That brings them to 49 seats.

There are a few tossup seats as well: Georgia, Iowa, North Carolina and Montana.  On the one hand, these all seem like Trump states to me.  But at least two of them (Ga and NC) may be so close that even a tiny bit of split ticket voting may matter.   

In particular, in North Carolina the Democrat, Cal Cunningham, has had a small lead in the last six or seven polls.  So I’m going to go out on a limb and guess he wins. 

Poll data from the other 3 states is more ambiguous, so my guess is that if (as I suspect) Trump wins them, the Republican wins as well.

This means a 50-50 Senate.  (Actually 50-49 since there in Georgia there will be probably a runoff later this year between Raphael Warnock and one of two Republicans; I expect the Republican to win that since Republicans tend to do better in Georgia runoffs than in the first election). 

I note that there are a few other close elections (most notably Minnesota, Michigan, Kansas, and South Carolina) but in those states one candidate (the Democrat in the first two, the Republican in the last two) has had a consistent but small lead and so I think that those leads will hold.


The only gubernatorial race that appears to be close is Montana. There it seems like a Republican is slightly favored to pick up a governorship from the Dems.


I don’t expect any significant change in the House, given that the generic ballot test shows Democrats with a significant lead. I’ll guess no change in the House- if either party picks up over half a dozen seats I’d be surprised.


Big picture: the generic ballot average (that is the average poll asking voters to choose between a generic D and a generic R) shows a 7.5 pt Dem lead.  But in 3 of the last 4 midterms, the Democrats have underperformed the RCP average by between 2.5 and 3.5 points (2010 was an exception; the Dems were doing so poorly in the generic ballot than their slightly better real-world performance was a regression to the mean).   So if tradition follows precedent, which of course it might not, the Dems will lead nationally by between 4 and 5 points.

Given that Dems are more concentrated in a few urban districts, will this be enough for them to take the House? suggests that the Dems need almost a 6 point lead to retake the House, so if I am right about likely Democratic underperformance (which I might not be given the likely higher-than-usual turnout) the Democrats will fall short of taking the House, probably by just a few seats.  But they could gain a few more or a few less, and I don’t think we will know on election night because there are a lot of close races in California and some of them could take days to count because California counts its absentee ballots slowly.

My guess: Dems gain 20 seats, for a total of 215 to the Republicans’ 220.


Most races are not particularly close. There are only two strong opportunities for a Democratic pickup (Arizona, Nevada) and four for a Republican pickup (Indiana, North Dakota, Florida, Missouri).  There are also several races where one candidate is ahead in every poll but not by much- Tennessee, West Virginia, Montana, Texas, New Jersey.  I am going to assume that every election in the latter category follows the polls, and focus on the half a dozen real tossups.

ARIZONA- Democrat Sinema leads in the RCP poll average, but not by much.  However, the early voting favors Republicans to a much greater extent than in most other close states; 42 percent of early voters are registered Republicans and only 33 percent are Democrats, the biggest Republican lead in any swing state (see ).  Unless independents go Democrat by an overwhelming margin this may be an insurmountable Republican lead.  So I think Rep. Martha McSally holds the seat for the Republicans.

NEVADA- If I just looked at poll data Sen. Dean Heller would be reelected; he leads by 2 points in the RCP average.  But the only poll from the last week or so shows Democrat Jacky Rosen retaking the lead.  Also, registered Dems lead in early voting, and Democrats have a history of overperforming poll results in Nevada.  In 2012, Heller led by 4 pts in the RCP average and only 1 pt on election day. So I’m reluctantly calling this a DEM PICKUP

North Dakota- Dem incumbent Heidi Heitkamp is losing in every poll, so this is a REPUBLICAN PICKUP.

Florida- Dem incumbent Nelson has a paper-thin lead in most polls.  Republicans lead in early voting but by less than in 2014.  I am reluctantly calling this for the Democrat, but realistically there is a really good chance I could be wrong.

INDIANA- Two of the last three polls show Democrat Joe Donnelly ahead.  But in 2016, an Indiana Senate election broke heavily R at the end, as undecided voters in this Republican state came home to their party.  So I suspect the same will happen this year.  R PICKUP

MISSOURI- Claire McCaskill won in 2012 against very weak Republican opposition, but this year she has a solid establishment Republican opponent in a state that has become very Republican.  Of three October polls, one shows a tie and two show a paper-thin Republican lead. R PICKUP

TOTAL – 3 Republican pickups, 1 Democratic pickup.  Senate Total: 53 R 47 D


Lots of party changes. The following seats seem at least moderately safe for the incumbent party:

Dems- RI, Mass, Minnesota, Colorado, Oregon (actually kinda close but consistent D lead), California, Hawaii

Reps- NH, Vt, Mass,  Md, SC, Ala, Tn, Ark, Tx, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Wyoming, Idaho, Arizona

Some seats that might switch:

Maine- D PICKUP, Dems have lead.

Ct- This may be close, but most polls show a lead for Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont.  In both 2010 and 2014, Dems slightly overperformed the RCP polling average so I am calling this a D HOLD.

Ga- Most polls show either a tie vote or a Republican lead.  I think Republican Brian Kemp will pull it out without a runoff; Republicans slightly overperformed the RCP average in all three of the last three gubernatorial elections, as undecided voters came home to the majority party.  R HOLD

Fla- The polls show Democrat Andrew Gillum ahead, usually by 2 or 3 pts.  I find it hard to imagine a super-progressive black Democrat taking a Trump state after 20 years of GOP governors.  But Obama actually overperformed polls in Florida, and the Republican doesn’t seem all that impressive.  So I am reluctantly saying D PICKUP- hugely against my better judgment.

Ohio- Democrat Cordray has taken a small lead in most recent polls in this open seat state, and there doesn’t seem to be a strong pattern of one party outperforming polls in close elections (unlike in Georgia) .  D PICKUP

Illinois- Republican Gov. Rauner has never been popular.  D PICKUP

Michigan- Democrat Gretchen Whitmer has a small but stable lead in this open seat race. D PICKUP

Wisconsin- This is the one governors’ race (other than Florida) I am really uncertain about. Scott Walker is tied with the Democrat in the most recent poll, after trailing for most of the year. Walker came from behind in 2014 and I suspect he’ll do it again.  R HOLD

Iowa- RCP shows no October polls in this race, so your guess is as good as mine.  But early voting trends seem heavily Democratic, and the only polls out there show the Democrat taking the lead from incumbent Gov. Reynolds.  D PICKUP I guess.

Kansas- Virtually every poll in RCP shows a 1 pt lead for one of the candidates; this is a Republican state but Republican Kris Kobach won a narrow, bitterly contested primary and is too far right for the state.  A Dem-leaning independent has 9 percent or so in the vote in most polls; I suspect most of his support will distintegrate at the last minute, throwing the election to Democrat Laura Kelly.  D PICKUP

South Dakota- This open seat race is close, but the most recent poll shows a very slight lead for Republican Kristi Noem.  R HOLD

New Mexico – In this open seat, Democrat Michelle Grisham has a consistent lead D PICKUP

Nevada- This seems close but Democrat Steve Sisolak has a paper-thin lead in the most recent poll, and Nevada Democrats often outperform polls.  D PICKUP

Alaska- This seat is currently held by an independent who is not running again.  Republican Dunleavy has a narrow but consistent lead R PICKUP

Total + 8D 25 D 25 R (probably the only area where Dems exceed expectations!)






In 2004, I taught a summer session at Cardozo Law School in NYC.  Below is an account I wrote of my housing adventures, which I dug up from a now-extinct blog: 

I visited 18 places, made 6 offers, and spent about two months on and off looking. My original plan was to find a doorman building for under $1000. Needless to say I got neither (though since I am staying for only a month I can afford more than I thought anyhow, and besides it is pretty close to 1000- basically 1000 plus utilities). Here’s the chronology:
Mid May: Make first visit; initially was planning to stay from June 1 to mid August.
Visited one place on Wall St (45 Wall) that I really liked, and a few hours later emailed my first offer. (I had been told that they were not sure whether they actually needed a roommate yet, as one roommate’s summer plans were unclear). That night my offer was rejected because the roommate in question decided to come to NYC in June instead of September, so they really did not need another one after all. The other places (in Ft Greene, Astoria and Weehawken) I was underwhelmed by- all lacked a/c (or there was a/c in a living room that was not close enough to cool the bedroom). Lesson learned (lesson #1): ask about a/c before you visit a place if you insist on that.
After that weekend, it occurs to me that I may not need a place in June after all because I would only be in NYC for 8 or 10 days in June (could stay with friends for most of it). So what I decide to do is limit myself to day trips or places that looked real good.
A bit later in May- Visit a place in West New York (near Weehawken, a inner ring suburb with low crime rate and beautiful view of Manhattan skyline) which turned out to be awful. I didn’t realize that going a few blocks inland is the difference between good and not so good areas. Lesson #2 learned: In Jersey stay near the water, because just as in NYC a few blocks can make a huge difference.
A bit later still in May-! Visit another place in Weehawken (doorman loft bldg, on south side of city towards Hoboken) that I adore. Unfortunately the roommate who is showing the place is not the roommate who is making the business arrangements; the latter is off in Alabama doing summer theatre. A couple of hours after my visit, I begin negotiations with an email, stating that I want the place but need to know whether it was available till the 15th (since the roommate showing the place did not know of this fact). I go home to wait for a reply, and call the Ala. roommate telling him to read my email. Two days later, I get an email from the latter saying he rented the apartment to someone who had looked at the place earlier (and who presumably had emailed him roughly simultaneously). (PS I do not criticize Ala. roommate; it sounds like he did exactly what I would have done in his place).
So I count this as rejected offer #2.
first couple of days in June- Now semester is seriously beginning. I visit a couple of places – one in Ditmas Park (a part of Brooklyn with beautiful single family Victorian homes and seriously decrepit apt bldgs) and one in Upper West Side. Ditmas Park place is tempting on paper- apt all to myself w/security guard in front, all for only 750 or something like that. Downsides: lessor wants it rented all the way till end of August (which reduces my fiscal benefit) and no a/c in apt. I walk through the neighborhood at night, get VERY mixed vibes especially as I approach nearest subway stop (Newkirk on B line I think). I decide to get up VERY early next morning, visit second nearest subway line (Foster on F line) and walk through. Foster area seems much nicer than Newkirk and as I approach apt am seriously thinking of taking it. Then I talk to someone walking her dog outside building, and pepper her with questions. She has almost nothing positive to say about the building or its management or the neighborhood- drug deals go on near Newkirk, some of the apartment house s near the one I was interested in are full of scuzzy people, and worst of all, the management is hostile to sublessees. I realize that this woman has saved me from a terrible fate and thank her. That night I visit a place on the Upper West Side- doorman building but not in great shape, and I would have to have a/c-less room and limited kitchen privileges, because a 1 BR has been cut up into one room with the kitchen and dining room (where my seventysomething Russian roomie would live) and I get the bedroom. I am glad to leave. Lesson learned: even in doorman buildings you cannot count on air conditioning. Lesson learned #2: roommates are better situations in some ways than pure sublease. Why? (1) landlord might hate sublessees, and use as excuse to throw out everyone and charge higher rent; (2) (and this isn’t really related to Ditmas Park thing) it generally occurred to me that if a pipe bursts you want someone who can fight for you with the landlord,! since the landlord is not going to be all that interested in doing much for a sublessee who will only be there for a month.
June 8-9: My original plan is to visit a place on the 8th (Tue.) in Riverdale that looks wonderful on paper, then take it if I see no negatives. But I learn at last minute that roommate has to work from 8 AM to 10 PM that day; she says let’s talk Wed. So I make other arrangements- see places in Soho (nice but only till 8-1, and sublessor’s attitude towards pets seemed quite grudging), Union City (nasty nasty nasty), and finally a place in Jersey City (the Newport complex) that I really like. Everything seemed wonderful- roommate very nice, Newport very nice. But Riverdale seemed so tempting – major Jewish area with at least one very interesting and unusual congregation I have read about, while Jersey City very non Jewish by NYC standards (though it still has a couple of congregations- probably fairly Jewish by Atlanta ! standards!) Plus, would be Newport roommate was going away f! or next couple of days so I figured if I waited 24 hours no one else would get Newport place. So what happens on Wed June 9? I spend all day waiting for a phone or email from the Riverdale lady. I never hear anything. I leave phone messages and still never hear anything. (I gather she doesn’t have phone or email access where she works, or maybe she suffered some unfortunate accident, Heaven forbid).
By Wed 9 PM I give up on Riverdale, call Newport person. But her cell is off, so I hear nothing.
So on Thursday morning (June 9) I email . . .
offer #3 to Newport person right before I go to airport for nephew’s bar mitzvah. I figure she hasn’t been in Jersey City since I visited her so how could anyone else have snapped up apt? She emails me back saying that though I am still her first choice she has made other appointments. And on Friday the 10th she emails me saying that a coworker wanted the room, and that (presumably! as a matter of office politics) she could not say no to him. (PS Again, I would have done the same in her place). Lesson learned: If you see a place you like, MAKE AN OFFER IMMEDIATELY (or at least within several hours). DO NOT WAIT A DAY. EVEN FOR ROOMMATE SITUATIONS, EVEN ON THE JERSEY SIDE, COMPETITION IS STIFF.
So then I spend five days in Atlanta (for a nephew’s bar mitzvah), come back the night of the 15th. I only have a couple of days to look because then I am going to Carbondale, Ill. to look for apts THERE for the fall. (Of course, I have no memorable stories about that experience- in a town of 20,000 there are simply not that many choices, especially for people with pets who don’t want ten times as much space as they need).
So all I really have to play with are June 16 (Wed) and 17 (Thurs.) Wed. night I visit a place in Battery Park City which I like. Brimming with confidence, I wave my checkbook at the roommates and make . . .
offer #4. The roommates respond that they have othe r people to talk to and will make no decisions till the weekend; they are in the proverbial catbird seat because it is such a desirable place. Lesson: Even if you make an offer it might not be accepted, because roommates may feel free to take some time to pick the person they like best.
On Thurs. I visit a place on the Upper West Side (OK but doesn’t go all the way through 8-15; also visiting was a waste of time because even though roommate who showed me apt thought pets were OK, he learns otherwise after talking with other roommate). (Also visit place in Long Island City, but they only wanted long term roommates; we had a slight communications breakdown) Then I visit a very nice place (the Pennmark in Midtown) and make
… offer #5. Next morning they accept. So as of June 18, I think all is well – starting around July 4 I have a place.
But it isn’t. The departing Pennmark roommate was closing on a condo, said it would be done! by early July so I would move in long before my Philly lease expired July 20. On June 30 I get email from Pennmark roommate saying there has been a snag; a document needed for closing was not available and the seller needs a couple of weeks to find it. But at this time he still had some hope of closing before the 20th. On July 4 I get email saying whole situation is kaplooey and that I should find other arrangements.
So by this time I am desperate- I only have 16 days before Phila. lease goes poof, and by going through (key source of potential deals) I notice most people not only don’t want a roommate ENDING August 15, many of them want someone STARTING August 15. So between July 4 and July 11 I sent out 125 emails (only 4 of which led to appointments, though 2 or 3 others would have had I not settled on a place). By contrast in May my email to appointment ratio was one out of ten, because a lot more people are willing to rent to someone for two and a half months than for one month. And I am looking at different places: while in May I wanted either doorman buildings or buildings in one or two super safe suburbs, now I just want anything in a relatively nice area. So on July 7-8 I see four places (one in Upper East Side, one in Upper West Side, one in Harlem, one in Stuyvestant Town in far East Village – first two are walkups, only Harlem is doorman building). Instead of making an offer, I ask whether they have additional appointments (subtle code for “are you ready to make a commitment if I am?”. Everyone has additional appointments.
On Friday the 9th I email UES roommate saying essentially “You are my first choice” …
which of course is offer #6. Since she has option of picking someone long term, I make point of saying that in mid August zillions of people will be graduating from law and business schools, so it is not like she has sacrificed her chances of finding long term roommate. I expect to get a rejection email on Sunday or Monday but instead first thing Monday morning she says yes by email, and suggests we speak about an appointment on Tuesday to pay rent checks etc.
We don’t get to speak on phone till Monday at 1, and she says she has to fly out of town at 8:30 (which means at airport at 6) (We had originally thought she would go out of town later in the week). I realize it is now or never for both of us. I run to the train station, take NJ Transit train to NYC (Amtrak would have been faster but it is SO expensive and I think I have plenty of time), do not get into NYC till 5:10. Cabs no good for me because it is rush hour, raining and I don’t have the cash anyhow. So I take subway, planning to go up west side subway line from railroad station (at 33rd and 8, very far west) then crosstown to apartment. But disaster strikes- my subway train turns out to be an express train and at 5:40 I am at 125 st and STILL on the west side. I take train back down to 86 st, take crosstown bus, and get off it ex! actly at 6. Am terrified that I have missed roommate, especially since I call her as soon as I get off bus and don’t get a response. I walk to apartment, thinking terribly gloomy thoughts. At 6:05 or so I get to apartment on 83rd st.
At this point, the story SHOULD say: she was at the door packing luggage in her cab to the airport, and I gave her the check (and she gave me the keys) right as she was about to climb into the cab to the airport. That would be a great story and a fittingly suspenseful end to the whole apartment drama.
But the real story is more boring: her flight was delayed till 11 PM or something, so we had a leisurely visit. I gave her a check, dropped off some clothes, and went home to Philadelphia to do some more packing.

I wound up living in the UES with this woman for the grand total of a month (from mid July to mid August). 

Of course, this story would probably be less thrilling today (in 2018) for a couple of reasons: first, the city is much safer so I would have been less picky about neighborhoods; second, I would have airbnb as a back up option.

The debate is here.   My notes:

Opening statments- Dietl is shouty man.  Malliotakis focuses adequately on DiBlasio’s weaknesses (subways, homeless) and DiBlasio on the city’s strengths (crime).

On homelessness- non incumbents complain about status quo.  (I like Dietl’s line praising pre-K spending under DiBlasio).  Malliotakis goes with laundry list strategy, sounding “inside the Beltway.” DiBlasio brags about 900 homeless off the street, which doesn’t seem like a lot.   He also emphasizes legal services to fight evictions- but if you make it harder to evict, doesn’t that impose costs on landlords that might be reflected in higher rents?

After an exchange on inequality, DiBlasio lists key achievements: pre-K, low crime, declining poverty.  Hits Malliotakis on minimum wage.  Malliotakis shifts debate to schools, campaign contributions from developer.   Seems like both candidates evading each other’s attacks.

DiBlasio gets question about 20 percent increase in city spending.  Responds by saying city reserves high, lists good things he’s done with money.   When asked about history of nonpayment of taxes, Dietl sounds slightly unhinged.

When asked about how to cut spending, Malliotakis talks about how she has brought spending home to her district in Albany (not exactly an answer).   Ultimately she does answer by answering a question with a question.  Not her strongest answer.

On transit, Dietl incoherent.  Malliotakis calls for more MTA spending, points out that the city appoints people to the MTA board.  DiBlasio blames the state.

On crime, basic exchange is as follows: DiBlasio says “crime down”, everyone else says “is not.”   Facts are here.

Malliotakis comes out against closing Rikers – why not fix what we have rather than building a bunch of new jails? Also, a jail on an island inherently a good idea- people can’t escape as easily.   DiBlasio pivots to “we’re doing more on rehabilitation”.

DiBlasio asks others: did you really think Trump would be better? I’m not sure Malliotakis says she’s answered the question in other places.

When asked about segregated schools, DiBlasio a bit vague.  Other candidates don’t really address this issue, and focus on education generally.

Moderator asks “who will control developers from gentrifying the city?”  (Stupid question- assumes new housing is bad unless its government-subsidized).  Dietl calls for extorting money out of developers.  Malliotakis focuses on giving stuff to nonprofits.   Complains about campaign contributions to developers.  Both too far left for me on this issue.   This is an area where we really could have used a Libertarian in the race.

Debate finishes with some accusations about immigration, not much of which I understood.

Winner:  Not Dietl.






I am happy to announce that I now have tenure at Touro Law Center.

It seems to me that liberals and conservatives often make very similar arguments.  For example, I occasionally hear or read the following argument from the Right:

“Black people should stop worrying about trigger-happy police because more blacks are killed by criminals.”

And from the Left:

“Americans should stop worrying about Islamist terrorism because more Americans are killed by cause X.” (Cause X can be a lot of things, ranging from car crashes to falls in bed; I don’t think there is one cause liberals are fixated on).


This year, several of President Trump’s appointees have been approved on party-line votes.  In particular, there was a significant mass mobilization of Democrats against the Sessions and DeVos nominations, if my Facebook news feed is any guide.

Why do Democrats bother?  They weren’t going to get enough Republican votes to defeat the nominations, and even if they had defeated the nominations, there is no reason to believe that President Trump’s next choice would be more ideologically congenial.  I’m not sure that (from a liberal perspective) Sessions is any worse than whoever a President Cruz would have appointed.*  And since DeVos endorsed Jeb Bush, I think she’s probably more moderate than whoever President Cruz would have appointed.  So if the goal of this mobilization was to move justice or education policy to the Left, the effort spent on these nominations was a complete waste of time, and would probably have been a waste of time even if these nominations had been defeated.

So here’s an alternative explanation: the goal of political parties isn’t to be ideologically coherent, but to win elections.  How do you win elections?  Not just by persuading centrists, but also by motivating your base to organize, give money, vote etc.  And what does that?  A good fight with the other side, whether a winning fight or a losing one.  So Democrats were spoiling for a fight with Trump- if it hadn’t been Sessions and DeVos, it would have been something else.

To draw an analogy: the Obama stimulus plan probably wasn’t that different from what President McCain would have proposed.  But Republicans successfully mobilized their base to fight it.  Why?  Because Republicans needed a fight.



*Though from a libertarian perspective he is much more problematic.

I know its a little early, but I feel inspired.

For the Democrats’ leading Wall-Street basher (to the tune of the Underdog theme)

When bankers in Wall Street appear

and break the laws that they should fear

And steal from all both far and near

The cry goes out from East to West for

Elizabeth Warren (Chorus: Senator Warren)

Elizabeth Warren (Chorus: Senator Warren)

Voice of lightning

Roar of thunder

Fighting all who rob or plunder

Elizabeth Warren (Chorus: Senator Warren)

Elizabeth Warren (Chorus: Senator Warren)

For a Republican Senator who seems to have lost his voice in recent months

Wake up, Little Marco, wake up!

Wake up, Little Marco, wake up!

Conservatives lulled asleep, wake up little Marco and weep,

Trump’s wiping out NATO and we’re in trouble deep,

Wake up, Little Marco..

Well, what can we do for Poland,

What can we do for the Czechs?

Are we going to protect them from Trump’s friend Putin

or just throw them under the bus?

Wake up, Little Marco, wake up!

President Trump hasn’t been so hot

Sucked in by the Kremlin’s plots

America’s not leading the free world

our reputation is shot

Go to Iowa, Little Marco

Go to New Hampshire and run again

Wake up, Little Marco! Wake up!